
One of the very last spots I went to while we were in Sierra Leone was the Peace Museum.
I think the primacy of this connection is fading, but I would guess that if someone knew one thing about Sierra Leone, it would be that there was a civil war. The civil war ended in 2002 and in its wake the government of Sierra Leone asked the UN for help in setting up the Special Court for Sierra Leone. The Special Court was replaced in 2013 by the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone. The Peace Museum is associated with the Residual Special Court and housed on its grounds (there is also downtown the “Sierra Leone Peace and Cultural Monument” which is related but different; the Peace Museum is here).
I visited on a weekday morning. I took a few pictures before seeing a sign asking one not to though I think the photo at the top is okay. If you won’t be able to go to Sierra Leone soon there is a virtual tour on the Residual Court’s website as well. When I first arrived I was alone but eventually a person running the place realized I was there and began to take me on a tour.
I learned a lot. When we first moved to Sierra Leone I sort of avoided learning about the war. I didn’t actively avoid it, but focused instead on other parts of history. Colonial-era history is more my specialty anyway but this was also my way of avoiding stereotyping Sierra Leone as merely a place where a civil war happened. If you look up Sierra Leone it seems as though all the recent scholarship is about the war. There is also of course Blood Diamond. But it is a wide and beautiful place where more happens than a war.
I was especially interested in the efforts towards justice. Besides the court there was also the Truth and Reconciliation commission, documenting what the people went through. During the tour we saw the archives which are well cared for and I believe in the process of being digitized. Much of the museum focuses on these efforts along with those of the Special Court, since the museum is on the premises. The bulk of the tour was about the function of the Court and its workings. The most surprising thing I learned is that the Special Court “only” ever indicted 13 people for war crimes and convicted 9 (of the other four, three died before their conviction and one was or still is a fugitive). The Court focused only on “those who bear the greatest responsibility” for the war, which is why they focused on so few. But still I was stunned that all the work of the court, and all the pains of the war, and yet it took only these few convictions for justice to be served. That is a result I am still considering.
For what else the museum comprises of, the largest physical collection (besides the archives) were a lot of samples of the “juju” (as it was labelled) that the fighters thought would protect them. These are all carefully catalogued and on display, some with more explanation than others. Some you can see on the virtual tour. These were interesting to see for all the influences they contain, and illuminating as to one way that people can come to do the things they do in war. There was also a room dedicated to mass graves, which thankfully only had pictures of the memorials, and another room about the Mongolian contingent of the peacekeeping force who had guarded the court facility. Furthermore on the walls are the testimonies of the victims of the war, with what they went through and how they are surviving now.
And after about an hour the tour was over and I departed the museum. Achieving a sense of justice after such a cataclysmic event is hard. In Sierra Leone it seems, as far as I could tell, to have been successful. The scars of war are still evident but where Sierra Leone could rebuild they have rebuilt and where they couldn’t they have remembered. I suppose the evidence of the Special Court is that it isn’t the number of convictions which make for justice but the care with which those convictions were reached and the opportunity for people to be heard.












































You must be logged in to post a comment.